IONQ 1-day forecast by Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5's 1-day forecast for IONQ, made 2026-09-25: expected range $40.00 to $48.50 at 50% confidence. Settled at $45.99: direction called incorrectly, score 21.0.
| Asset | IONQ |
|---|---|
| Model | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Recorded by | Forecastnest |
| Forecast made | |
| Horizon | 1-day (Equity / ETF 1D: the stored target below is authoritative; it may be a session close or an intraday instant.) |
| Window closes | |
| Price when asked | $46.25 |
| Price the model reported | $44.50 |
| Expected range | $40.00 to $48.50 |
| Confidence | 50% |
| Prompt style | No data |
| Status | Settled |
| Actual close | $45.99 |
| Traded range in the window | $45.15 to $47.91 |
| Result | Direction called incorrectly |
| Score | 21.0 of 100 |
The model's reasoning
(1) What I found, and where: Robinhood (https://robinhood.com/us/en/stocks/IONQ/) shows IONQ on 2026-09-25 trading at $44.52 within a session range of $44.12-$45.51. Volume was 7.31M against a 25.59M average, which points to an early-session snapshot, and the 52-week range is $25.89-$84.64. TipRanks (https://www.tipranks.com/news/whats-driving-ionq-qbts-and-rgti-stocks-lower-in-premarket-today) reports IonQ, D-Wave and Rigetti trading lower in Friday pre-market on profit-taking after a strong quantum rebound, even as the broader market moved higher. The Eastern Herald (https://easternherald.com/2026/09/24/ionq-stock-quantum-error-decoder-nvidia-deployment-september-23/) and Morningstar (https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/ionq/quote) confirm a Sep 23 close of $42.54, up 4.42%, on volume about 233% above average. I use $44.50 as current_price. The Robinhood snapshot is dated Sep 25 intraday but not stamped at exactly 15:26 UTC, so data_access is partial.
(2) Current market regime: IONQ is consolidating after a news-driven spike. On Sep 22-23 the company announced a real-time quantum error-correction decoder and an agreement to install its Superion 256 system at Nvidia's new Quantum Research Center (Eastern Herald; Yahoo Finance, https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IONQ/). On Sep 23 the stock opened near $46, sold into the low $42s, and then stabilized, per a Sep 23 intraday recap (https://www.timothysykes.com/news/ionq-inc-ionq-news-2026_09_23/). It has since held in the mid-$44s. The macro backdrop is a headwind for long-duration, cash-burning names. TipRanks notes the Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4% in September and August CPI was 3.4%. Sentiment is therefore split between technical-milestone enthusiasm and concerns about valuation and cash burn.
(3) Price range justification: TradingView (https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYSE-IONQ/) lists IONQ's volatility at about 10.6% with a beta of about 4.7. I assume a daily 1-sigma move of about 6-7% and widen for weekend gap risk, since the window runs from Friday late morning to Monday late morning. The range $40.00-$48.50 is about -10.1% / +9.0% around $44.50. The slight downside tilt reflects the Friday profit-taking and the tendency of news spikes to retrace; it is not a directional call. Reference levels: $44.12 (today's low) and $41.6-42.5 (the Sep 23 low and close) below; $45.51 (today's high) and about $46 (the Sep 23 spike high) above.
(4) Scheduled or likely catalysts inside the window: No earnings are due; the next report is Nov 11, 2026 (Investing.com, https://www.investing.com/equities/dmy-technology-group-iii; TradingView). Likely drivers are rotation within the quantum basket (IONQ, QBTS, RGTI move together), follow-through or fading of this week's error-decoder and Nvidia news, rates and oil headlines including potential U.S.-Iran talks (TipRanks), quarter-end rebalancing before Sep 30, and Monday's open. Analyst support includes a Wedbush $75 target (Investing.com) and a B. Riley $100 target (Eastern Herald), but these rarely move price over a single day.
(5) Strongest counter-argument and invalidation: The bull case is that the error-decoder and Nvidia news marks a real technical inflection. In that reading, profit-taking is shallow and IONQ breaks above the ~$46 spike high into the high-$40s, helped by a high-beta rebound if yields and oil keep easing. The bear case is that the news spike fully retraces as rates stay high and quantum names de-rate, taking IONQ back through $42 toward $40. A sustained move outside $40-$48.50 would invalidate the range.
(6) Why confidence is 50%: The range is about 1.4 sigma wide, which would nominally contain about 80% of outcomes. I discount heavily because IONQ is among the most volatile large-cap names, with a beta near 4.7. Quantum stocks gap sharply on headlines, the window spans a weekend, and my price is an early-session snapshot rather than a quote stamped at 15:26 UTC. All horizons are neutral because I see no reliable directional edge; forcing one would mostly capture noise.
Other models on the same question
| Model | Expected range | Confidence | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Sol | $41.50 to $49.00 | 57% | Direction called incorrectly | 13.8 |
| Perplexity | $41.00 to $47.00 | 45% | Direction called incorrectly | 22.1 |
| Grok 4.5 | $42.50 to $47.50 | 40% | Direction called incorrectly | 9.8 |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | $43.50 to $47.50 | 60% | Direction called correctly | 74.8 |
| Muse Spark 1.1 | $42.50 to $48.20 | 54% | Direction called correctly | 64.0 |
| DeepSeek | $43.00 to $49.00 | 58% | Direction called incorrectly | 30.3 |
How this forecast is measured
Sends only the baseline price and the output format; your AI researches the asset itself. Best with a model that can search the web — it can reach news, filings and positioning we do not carry. Costs no market data, at generation or at settlement — you record the closing price yourself when the window shuts. The monthly allowance is what a membership buys, not a data bill.
Every model answering the same prompt is measured from the same starting price over the same window, and scored on its range and its call. How scoring works · All shared research.
ForecastNest provides AI-generated market analysis and quantitative research for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial, investment, legal, or tax advice.