SPY 1-day forecast by GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol's 1-day forecast for SPY, made 2026-09-25: expected range $762.00 to $776.00 at 54% confidence. Settled at $765.09: no directional call, score 54.1.
| Asset | SPY |
|---|---|
| Model | GPT-5.6 Sol |
| Recorded by | Forecastnest |
| Forecast made | |
| Horizon | 1-day (Equity / ETF 1D: the stored target below is authoritative; it may be a session close or an intraday instant.) |
| Window closes | |
| Price when asked | $768.53 |
| Price the model reported | $769.40 |
| Expected range | $762.00 to $776.00 |
| Confidence | 54% |
| Prompt style | No data |
| Status | Settled |
| Actual close | $765.09 |
| Traded range in the window | $763.72 to $772.28 |
| Result | No directional call |
| Score | 54.1 of 100 |
The model's reasoning
(1) What I found: I could not retrieve a clean SPY trade timestamped exactly at the requested 2026-09-25 15:22 UTC baseline. Reuters reported at 9:59 a.m. ET that the S&P 500 was up 0.29% at 7,726.62; applying that same index move to SPY's verified September 24 close near $767.18 implies approximately $769.40, which I use as the best baseline estimate. A later Yahoo Finance quote showed SPY at $768.20 at 1:17 p.m. ET, confirming that the ETF remained near this area but had faded somewhat later in the session. Sources: https://www.reuters.com/business/wall-st-futures-gain-ai-enthusiasm-eases-worries-over-higher-oil-prices-yields-2026-09-25/ and https://nz.finance.yahoo.com/quote/SPY/history/
(2) Market regime: The index is near record territory but breadth is weak and leadership is concentrated. Reuters reported that eight of eleven S&P 500 sectors were declining around 9:59 a.m. ET even as the headline index gained 0.29%, largely because technology was up about 1%. Reuters also reported that nine of eleven S&P sectors were negative for September and the equal-weight index was down about 4% for the month, indicating that mega-cap strength is masking softer underlying participation. Sources: https://www.reuters.com/business/wall-st-futures-gain-ai-enthusiasm-eases-worries-over-higher-oil-prices-yields-2026-09-25/ and https://www.reuters.com/business/wall-st-week-ahead-jobs-report-inflation-data-test-us-rate-path-economic-2026-09-25/
(3) Price range: I use $762-$776 as the one-day envelope, giving modestly more downside than upside from the approximately $769.40 baseline because rising yields and narrowing breadth offset positive AI sentiment. SPY traded between $763.25 and $768.95 on September 24, $766.50 and $773.05 on September 23, and $772.57 and $775.14 on September 22. The $762-$764 area therefore represents nearby demonstrated support, while $773-$776 contains several recent highs and resistance tests. Sources: https://www.investing.com/etfs/spdr-s-p-500-historical-data and https://www.financecharts.com/etfs/SPY/summary/price
(4) Catalysts inside the window: The immediate macro drivers are Treasury yields, oil prices and Federal Reserve expectations rather than scheduled corporate events for the ETF itself. Reuters reported the 10-year Treasury yield near 5.1%, Brent crude above $100 per barrel and market-implied odds of at least a 25-basis-point Fed increase in October at about 64%. Fed policymakers including John Williams, Jeffrey Schmid and Beth Hammack were also scheduled to speak later September 25, creating potential headline volatility. Source: https://www.reuters.com/business/wall-st-futures-gain-ai-enthusiasm-eases-worries-over-higher-oil-prices-yields-2026-09-25/
(5) Counter-argument and invalidation: The strongest bullish counter-argument is persistent AI-driven demand for large-cap technology shares, which has repeatedly supported the capitalization-weighted S&P 500 despite weak breadth. Reuters reported technology leading the market on September 25 and global equity funds receiving their strongest inflows since early July. A sustained move above approximately $773-$775 would suggest that the market is overcoming rate and oil pressure; a break below approximately $763 would indicate that breadth deterioration and higher yields are exerting greater influence than my neutral base case assumes. Sources: https://www.reuters.com/business/wall-st-futures-gain-ai-enthusiasm-eases-worries-over-higher-oil-prices-yields-2026-09-25/ and https://www.reuters.com/world/china/global-markets-flows-graphic-2026-09-25/
(6) Confidence: 54% reflects weak directional conviction. Positive technology momentum, continued fund inflows and proximity to record highs are balanced by a 10-year Treasury yield above 5%, elevated oil prices, expectations for additional Fed tightening and deteriorating market breadth. I also could not retrieve an exact SPY trade at 15:22 UTC, so the baseline price is an index-linked estimate rather than an exchange-timestamped SPY print.
Other models on the same question
| Model | Expected range | Confidence | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | $766.00 to $772.00 | 65% | No directional call | 53.7 |
| Perplexity | $763.00 to $772.00 | 51% | No directional call | 54.4 |
| Grok 4.5 | $762.00 to $775.00 | 42% | No directional call | 53.6 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $756.00 to $778.50 | 55% | No directional call | 53.5 |
| Muse Spark 1.1 | $762.00 to $777.00 | 58% | No directional call | 54.2 |
| DeepSeek | $762.00 to $777.00 | 62% | No directional call | 54.4 |
How this forecast is measured
Sends only the baseline price and the output format; your AI researches the asset itself. Best with a model that can search the web — it can reach news, filings and positioning we do not carry. Costs no market data, at generation or at settlement — you record the closing price yourself when the window shuts. The monthly allowance is what a membership buys, not a data bill.
Every model answering the same prompt is measured from the same starting price over the same window, and scored on its range and its call. How scoring works · All shared research.
ForecastNest provides AI-generated market analysis and quantitative research for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial, investment, legal, or tax advice.